Quote:
Originally Posted by 1stgen
Mustang dynos read notoriously high actually. Why do you guys think otherwise. Dyno dynamics and the dynojet are more accurate and will compensate correctly. It's all in the operator off the dyno, you can make any numbers you want if you tell the dyno to put less load on the pull.
|
P.S. there is no "load" on a Dynojet. You just spin the rollers and they have a brake. Pretty easy to make bigger power numbers when the tires have no resistance at all. It's like lubrication during sex, just makes everythign smooth. Dyno Dynamics/Mustang are both (as I mentioned) eddy current load bearing dyno's which both read notoriously LOWER than Dynojet. I've been to both a DD and Mustang...NEVER put any of my cars on a Dynojet. Jay can attest to how low DD's read, also. Not anywhere near as high as a Dynojet. I hate dyno debates. I just felt the need to education you in this field. As I can't match you in the driving category
__________________
JDM AWD Turbocharged Madness
The "replacement for displacement" is measured in 'psi'!
"You can lose a lot of money chasing women. But you'll never lose a woman chasing money." -A man much wiser than I
