View Single Post
  #37 (permalink)  
Old 10-12-2007, 11:26 AM
xceebeex's Avatar
xceebeex xceebeex is offline
Premium Member

 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Owego, NY
Posts: 2,158
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikecentola View Post

Only cables carrying an analog signal really make any difference, and it's unlikely that you will see that difference at the level of packaged systems. I replaced the speaker wire that came with the kit with some belkin pure-av simple because the stuff that comes is REALLY small, and the belkin was cheap for a spool. For cables, however, I would look into AudioQuest. They are some of the best cables around, but not cheap at all. I think the 75 ohm coax digital cables that I have for my studio monitors were like $75 each for 2m.

Remember HDMI carries a digital signal, so don't waste your money on a monster or anything special. I bought HDMI cables for like $3 a piece from firefold, and they'll work fine. Home - FireFold
BINGO! I laugh at the people who spend 60-70 bucks on an HDMI cable when a $10 one will look identical.

This whole debate over which TV is best is kinda dumb because there is no right answer. Its all a matter of opinion. Go look at them all, find what looks best to YOU and weigh your own pros and cons of each and decide that way. You guys are lumping almost all rear projection TV's into DLP, but what you need to understand is that LCoS is a much different technology and IMO, looks better than DLP. (This is coming from someone who was always in love with the Samsung DLP's, but when I saw the JVC and Sony SXRD's I was blown away. I also think that my JVC looks better than the Sony's for much less money. Also as I stated, they are now wall mountable, even at 68")
__________________
'04 Z71 Avalanche - Stock
'01 Suzuki SV650S - Stock



Last edited by xceebeex : 10-12-2007 at 11:29 AM.
Reply With Quote