Spy pics of the new Challenger - Page 2

SilverRT4 · #16 (**permalink**) 11-21-2005, 03:29 PM

Wow, I totally agree, too bad Vipers are not in the 30k range.

Quote:

Originally Posted by screaminfast

i can't fathom paying 30k+ for a GM car thats not the corvette.

mikecentola · #17 (**permalink**) 11-21-2005, 03:39 PM

i would buy a viper, i've always liked vipers. not many american cars in general i'd buy over 35-40k

Khyron · #18 (**permalink**) 11-21-2005, 08:25 PM

*yawn* I've now said this on 5 forums.....they'll fuck it up. Chyrsler is half the company it once was, They baited us with the Charger concept. then swapped out that abortion of a car they call a Charger now. But I won't hold back. Want me to tell you how I really feel about it?

Quote:

Originally Posted by crazybrew609

atleast they remembered that it's sopposed to be a 2 door this time

After a year of yelling there is no market, now they go and put out a 2 door, yet they will never admit, we right and they were wrong.

Quote:

Originally Posted by mafdark

lol, maybe theyll sell it in something other than auto this time too.

yep, stick is an option on it. Once again, they yell that no one wants it, yet go and put it on, again, we where right, Chrysler was wrong.

Quote:

Originally Posted by SilverRT4

US car Manufacturers need to stop catering to the Laziness of todays society and put more sticks in car. Owww automatic this automatic that, no no it's not auto it tiptro

couldn't have said it beter myself.
But I will never go 4 speed in my Charger. Not that i'm lazy, but because it's too F-ing expensive

Quote:

Originally Posted by crazybrew609

i hope they make it out of plastic panels and only comes with a 4 cLy.. that woud be awsome

getting lonely?

Quote:

Originally Posted by screaminfast

i can't fathom paying 30k+ for a GM car thats not the corvette.

Swap GM with any company and I agree. I would never pay that much for any new sports car. Viper excluded

If I missed you, sorry

Captain Moai · #19 (**permalink**) 11-21-2005, 10:04 PM

it'll be too heavy to be nimble, too clumsy to be agile, and will basically fall apart after the first couple years, but it will make a great rumble and everywhere idiots will try to make it fast just because it starts with large displacement.

just like the original.

did i miss you, Khyron?

Khyron · #20 (**permalink**) 11-21-2005, 10:06 PM

well, that was uncalled for

crazybrew609 · #21 (**permalink**) 11-21-2005, 10:40 PM

thats it someone better clear out their box for this one

Captain Moai · #22 (**permalink**) 11-21-2005, 10:52 PM

my PM box is full, please send pipebombs directly to my snailmail.

Khyron · #23 (**permalink**) 11-21-2005, 10:56 PM

:haha:

mikecentola · #24 (**permalink**) 11-21-2005, 11:18 PM

hahahah nice

intern8tion9l · #25 (**permalink**) 11-22-2005, 09:47 PM

all i have to say is that its nice to see car companies getting back the old look instead of the ass ugly concepts taht are usually out. i don't think the car is that bad looking, even if it is a mopar

cps87rx7se · #26 (**permalink**) 11-23-2005, 08:50 PM

Let me tell you, I test drove a new Charger, and that thing is pretty damn quick. This was the 5.7 HEMI, I was not able to get my hands on the 6.1 HEMI which would be awesome.

Khyron · #27 (**permalink**) 11-23-2005, 09:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cps87rx7se

Let me tell you, I test drove a new Charger, and that thing is pretty damn quick. This was the 5.7 HEMI, I was not able to get my hands on the 6.1 HEMI which would be awesome.

the F-4 phantom is quick too, but it's still an ugly brick

this concept is what the Charger should have been. but i'm not bitter