It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

Register Forums Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read Tags


Click Here to find out about sponsoring RSPEED.ORG!

Membership Sponsors Store RSPEEDTV Garage Gallery Arcade Timeslips Donate

Go Back   rspeed.org > Main > Automotive

Welcome to the rspeed.org forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 01-10-2006, 11:11 PM
crazybrew609's Avatar
crazybrew609 crazybrew609 is offline
Queer Bait

 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Castleton
Posts: 3,189
Cobalt Phase 5 Dragster Specifications

Chassis: Unitized body and frame with roll cage

Body: Steel with RK Sport composite hood

Height: 55.7 in / 1415.4 mm

Length: 180.3 in / 4580 mm

Width: 67.9 in / 1725 mm

Wheelbase: 103.3 in / 2624 mm

Track: 57.1 in / 1449.7 mm front; 58.1 in / 1476 mm rear

Weight: 2,740 lbs.

Engine: 2.2L Ecotec I-4 TURBO CHARGED

Displacement: 134 ci / 2189 cc

Horsepower: 535 hp @ 7800 rpm with 28 psi boost

Torque: 367 lb-ft @ 6500 rpm with 28 psi boost

Transmission: Modified Hydra-Matic 4T65-E 4-speed automatic

Suspension: Modified Cobalt strut-type independent with coil springs front; modified Cobalt semi-independent torsion beam rear

Wheels: 15 x 9 front, 15 x 4.5 rear (Motegi)

Tires: 24.5 x 8 front; 24.0 x 4.5 rear (Mickey Thompson)

Brakes: Vented disc front and rear

Cobalt Phase 5 Dragster Components

GM Performance Parts CNC ported cylinder head (#88958640)

GM Performance Parts adjustable cam gear set (#88958613)

GM Performance Parts camshaft set (#88958648)

GM Performance Parts neutral balance shaft set (#88958615)

Wiseco piston, pin, and ring set

Eagle connecting rods

GM Racing modified Hydra-Matic 4T65-E 4-speed automatic transmission

Cobalt SS Supercharged rear suspension assembly including disc brakes, upgraded swaybar, and five-lug hubs

Garrett GT35R ball bearing turbocharger with water-to-air intercooler

AEM fuel management system with coil-on plug ignition

Fully adjustable front struts and Walker Evans Racing rear shock absorbers

Eibach front coil-over springs

Airlift rear suspension air bags for ride height adjustment

Recaro racing seats with Schroth six-point safety belts

Six-point safety cage

Onboard fire extinguisher system


heres a video of it running in the low 12's

Click here to see Video
__________________
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 01-10-2006, 11:21 PM
crazybrew609's Avatar
crazybrew609 crazybrew609 is offline
Queer Bait

 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Castleton
Posts: 3,189
the video is a qualifying video.. but it's still gives you a nice ball park.. that car doesn't go anyfaster then low 11's
__________________
Reply With Quote
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 01-10-2006, 11:42 PM
xceebeex's Avatar
xceebeex xceebeex is offline
Premium Member

 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Owego, NY
Posts: 2,078
Quote:
Originally Posted by crazybrew609
the video is a qualifying video.. but it's still gives you a nice ball park.. that car doesn't go anyfaster then low 11's
I don't see why a car with 535hp and weighing less than 2800 pounds can't run 11's. I just threw those numbers into a calculater and it comes out around 10.7. Now granted those calculators aren't 100% accurate, but they are close enough to get an idea.
__________________
'04 Z71 Avalanche - Stock
'01 Suzuki SV650S - Stock


Reply With Quote
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 01-11-2006, 12:07 AM
crazybrew609's Avatar
crazybrew609 crazybrew609 is offline
Queer Bait

 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Castleton
Posts: 3,189
the car has only done an 11.3 at best
__________________
Reply With Quote
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 01-11-2006, 12:26 AM
xceebeex's Avatar
xceebeex xceebeex is offline
Premium Member

 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Owego, NY
Posts: 2,078
Quote:
Originally Posted by crazybrew609
the car has only done an 11.3 at best
And you know this because.....

I am not saying that you are wrong, its just weird that they would publish a car and driver calendar that says it is well into the 10's if its not even close.
__________________
'04 Z71 Avalanche - Stock
'01 Suzuki SV650S - Stock


Reply With Quote
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 01-11-2006, 07:34 AM
mikecentola's Avatar
mikecentola mikecentola is online now
the director.

 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Webster, NY
Posts: 7,230
Quote:
Originally Posted by xceebeex
I don't see why a car with 535hp and weighing less than 2800 pounds can't run 11's. I just threw those numbers into a calculater and it comes out around 10.7. Now granted those calculators aren't 100% accurate, but they are close enough to get an idea.
a MINIMUM of 2900-2950 w/ driver
__________________


team one ftw!
mikecentola.com | technotic media | allstar graphics
Reply With Quote
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 01-11-2006, 10:26 AM
xceebeex's Avatar
xceebeex xceebeex is offline
Premium Member

 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Owego, NY
Posts: 2,078
Cleaned up a bit. Keep it on topic guys.
__________________
'04 Z71 Avalanche - Stock
'01 Suzuki SV650S - Stock


Reply With Quote
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 01-11-2006, 10:40 AM
xceebeex's Avatar
xceebeex xceebeex is offline
Premium Member

 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Owego, NY
Posts: 2,078
Quote:
Originally Posted by screaminfast
i think we need to find similar cars weight-wise and hp wise and see what they are running at the drag strip...
Yea I agree, it should probably be FWD too just to eliminate as many variables as possible.
__________________
'04 Z71 Avalanche - Stock
'01 Suzuki SV650S - Stock


Reply With Quote
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 01-11-2006, 10:43 AM
crazybrew609's Avatar