You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
I actually tuned on this dyno last night. I make Jimmy do the pulls in 4th gear for STi's and set the correction to 1.10.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Junior2JZ
I use 4th as well.. I dont know why 3rd gear was previously used.. 1.15 correction as well..
Quote:
Originally Posted by XX_Chris
One day we are setting the correction to 1.21 (which is what I was told the DJ correction was) the next it's 1.15, then I tune at 1.1 - What gives here?
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheShop
Ok guys lets play nice , the correction factor that we use here on my Dyno is 1.10 which reads a bit lower then a Dynojet , the one that reads closest or exactly what a Dynojet would read in my personal opinion is the 1.20 , they are only numbers lets let the track be the judge of really how much power indeed the cars make or dont make , and yes pulls used to be made in 3rd and do make a bit more power , but are now made in 4th - Jimmy
A couple choice quotes from a recent thread on another forum about questionable numbers coming from this dyno.
__________________
05 STI, built 2.5L, cams+headwork, gt35r+meth, dents and scratches galore
justin al no longer tunes at the shop. he is at ics performance now and has been for a little over a month. junior is doing all the subaru tuning there that i know of... not sure if he is doing the evo side of things as well or what.either way 500 is still nothing to sneeze at.. corrected numbers or not.
Hey, how about you read my post next time. Then maybe your response will make sense.
__________________
JDM AWD Turbocharged Madness
The "replacement for displacement" is measured in 'psi'!
"You can lose a lot of money chasing women. But you'll never lose a woman chasing money." -A man much wiser than I
I personally don't know what correction was used, but I did drive the car on sat. in 95 degree weather and it still went like a bastard. Only true way to tell is the trap speed when it goes to the track. Either way, the car sure is fast with an excellent powerband, seeing full boost around 4500 and reving to 8300 or so.
I wasn't going to piss on this thread, but somebody else already did it.
That dyno runs a 1.10 - 1.20 correction factor depending on who is operating it.
Wait. What dyno is this again???
I dont like that crap. It's way too easy to adjust #s to make customers happy.
__________________
This is Mike's dad and I've heard just about enough complaining from you guys. Autofest was cancelled because of lack of support from all of you, plain and simple. Blame yourselves. Here it is one month before the show and not one of you cheap bastards has pre- registered...
Last edited by Shawn96VR-4 : 08-28-2007 at 08:50 PM.